Data from your brain is yours. It is not collected, sold or mined for inferences without your consent.
Art. 02
Cognitive liberty
You decide whether technology touches your mind, and you keep the right to refuse it.
Art. 03
Mental integrity
No one may alter or interfere with your neural activity without informed consent.
Art. 04
Psychological continuity
Your identity and sense of self stay your own. No outside system rewrites them.
Art. 05
Free will
Your choices remain yours, free from covert neural manipulation by companies or states.
The last private place.
Remote neural weapons can read and write the human mind, and they are being used on civilians who never consented. Governments already compensate their own personnel for brain injuries no one will explain. Almost nowhere does the law protect what happens inside your head.
The brain is one electrical organ. A system that can reach one part of it can reach the rest. Driven by advanced AI, two-way and instantaneous, it works on every channel of a person at once.
Read
Thought
It reads thoughts as they form and predicts the next ones.
Write
Will
It inserts thoughts and drives the mind down chosen trains of thought.
See
Vision
It places generated images seamlessly into what a person sees.
Hear
Sound
It stimulates the auditory cortex directly, with no sound in the room.
Move
Body
It overrides motor control and moves muscles against the person's will.
Recall
Memory
It pulls up memories the person would never have recalled on their own.
It is remote, deniable and invisible to the people around the target. The documents are below. That is why the rights above have to be law, and why every report has to be investigated.
“the very same thing that operates your cell phone is providing us not only windows to the brain, but vectors to the brain … to read information in real time from brain nodes, networks, circuits, whole brain systems remotely, and also to remotely affect those brains.”
“nanoparticulate agents, aerosolizable nanomaterials that can be breathed in and disrupt blood flow or neurological network activity, that can be used as an in-close weapon or perhaps … as a more broad weapon of disruption and or destruction.”
“our Trans-Pacific competitors are gaining a major foothold … by the year 2035, with an eye on 2049, they're looking for global hegemony in many spaces inclusive of the neurosciences and technologies.”
“programs that utilize commercial veiling to be able to then hide behind … to develop a whole arsenal of weapons, both kinetically and non-kinetically.”
It is in the world
Most of this work is classified. What has surfaced is enough: peer-reviewed science, military patents, an Army definition taken offline, intelligence findings, laws and doctrine. 33 public documents, 1962 to 2026.
01
Sound and speech, sent by microwave
The science has been in peer-reviewed journals and patent filings for sixty years.
Peer-reviewed
Allan H. Frey · Journal of Applied Physiology
Human auditory system response to modulated electromagnetic energy
Pulsed electromagnetic energy at very low average power made both hearing and deaf people perceive sound. The effect now carries his name.
Walter Reed Army Institute of Research · reported in American Psychologist
Words transmitted by voice-modulated microwaves
Neuropsychologist Don Justesen reported an Army experiment by Joseph Sharp and Mark Grove in which subjects recognized nine of ten words sent by voice-modulated microwaves.
Defense and intelligence agencies studied, defined and funded it.
Declassified
DARPA · Project Pandora
The Moscow Signal and the brain
After the Soviets beamed microwaves at the US Embassy in Moscow, DARPA ran a classified program on what microwaves do to behavior. Declassified records describe experiments on monkeys and on unwitting sailors.
Defense Intelligence Agency · prepared by US Army Medical Intelligence Office · ST-CS-01-169-72
Controlled Offensive Behavior – USSR
A 177-page intelligence study of methods to manipulate the human mind: sound, light, electromagnetic energy, drugs, hypnosis and suggestion. Classified until 1990, approved for release in 2003.
“The ultimate goal of controlled offensive behavior might well be the total submission of one's will to some outside force.”
The DIA named microwave hearing as an effect that could offer antipersonnel uses, and warned it “showed great promise for disrupting the behavior patterns of military or diplomatic personnel.”
“Sounds and possibly even words which appear to be originating intracranially can be induced by signal modulation at very low average densities.”
US Army · Center for Army Lessons Learned thesaurus
“Voice to skull devices”
The Army defined V2K as a nonlethal weapon, including a silent sound device that can transmit sound into the skull, carrying voice or subliminal messages. Last reviewed 25 March 2004, later taken off the Army site. The Federation of American Scientists preserved it.
“Nonlethal weapon which includes (1) a neuro-electromagnetic device which uses microwave transmission of sound into the skull”
Called for an international convention introducing a global ban on developing and deploying weapons that might enable any form of manipulation of human beings.
The introduced bill listed psychotronic weapons among the systems it would ban.
“radiation, electromagnetic, psychotronic, sonic, laser, or other energies directed at individual persons or targeted populations for the purpose of information war, mood management, or mind control of such persons or populations”
Placed China's Academy of Military Medical Sciences and eleven of its institutes on the Entity List, citing biotechnology for military end uses including “purported brain-control weaponry.”
The brain is now called a battlespace, by name, in military writing.
NATO
NATO Allied Command Transformation · Innovation Hub
Cognitive Warfare
A six-month study commissioned by NATO's Supreme Allied Commander Transformation. It treats the human mind as both battlefield and objective, and proposes a “human domain” of operations.
Naval Postgraduate School · Lt Col Joshua D. Gramm (USAF) and Brian A. Branagan · approved for public release
Neurowar Is Here!
A 145-page military thesis. It concludes China and Russia either have or are developing neuroweapons and that “it is also likely that one or both states has already employed neuroweapons.”
“neurowar is not just coming, but rather is already here and is likely to fundamentally alter conflict and warfare”
Found the People's Liberation Army pursues “mind dominance,” and that its researchers rate cognitive victory as potentially more valuable than destroying forces.
A Chinese professor claimed the PLA used a microwave weapon on Indian soldiers in Ladakh, leaving them vomiting and unable to stand. India denied it; its defense ministry's year-end review said China used “unorthodox weapons” along the border.
Neuro-Cognitive Warfare: Inflicting Strategic Impact via Non-Kinetic Threat
The former State Department and National Security Council adviser who coined “NeuroStrike.” His definition of a neuroweapon:
“Neuroweapons are intended to influence, direct, weaken, suppress, or neutralize human thought, brainwave functions, perception, interpretation, and behaviors to the extent that the target of such weaponry is either temporarily or permanently disabled, mentally compromised, or unable to function normally.”
Enumerating, Targeting and Collapsing the CCP's Neurostrike Program
By a former Army microbiologist, a former Air Force intelligence officer and a Singapore senior fellow. A December 2023 follow-up added McCreight.
“the engineered targeting of the brains of military personnel or civilians using nonkinetic technology … to impair thinking, reduce situational awareness, inflict long-term neurological damage”
US Special Operations Command · Journal of Special Operations Medicine
Unconventionally acquired brain injury
Special Operations Command gave the injuries their own clinical name, UBI: brain injury with no traumatic incident and no known cause. The Secretary of Defense later termed them Anomalous Health Incidents.
A scientist built the device and tested it on himself
A Norwegian government scientist built a pulsed-microwave device in 2024 and suffered Havana-like neurological symptoms. Pentagon and White House officials visited.
Non-consensual experimentation on the public is documented history.
Senate
US Senate · joint hearing
Project MKULTRA, the CIA's Program of Research in Behavioral Modification
Two decades of CIA behavior-control research, 1953 to 1973. Most records were destroyed in 1973. In 1975 Congress and the Rockefeller Commission revealed that the CIA and Defense Department had experimented on unwitting people.
The weapons are decades old. Laws protecting the people they are used on are only a few years old, and most of the world has none.
Ienca & AndornoPropose four new human rights for the neurotech age: cognitive liberty, mental privacy, mental integrity, psychological continuity.
OECDRecommendation on Responsible Innovation in Neurotechnology, the first intergovernmental standard.
ChileConstitution amended to protect brain activity and the information drawn from it. The first country to do so.
Chile · Supreme CourtOrders Emotiv to delete brain data its consumer headset collected from a former senator.
ColoradoNeural data added to the state privacy act as sensitive data. The first US state.
CaliforniaNeural data added to the CCPA as sensitive personal information.
Neurorights FoundationReview of 30 consumer neurotech companies: 29 appeared to have access to users' neural data with no meaningful limits.
MontanaNeural data protections signed into state law.
UNESCO ↗Member states adopt the first global standard on the ethics of neurotechnology.
Everywhere elseNo law that names neural data. No ban on non-consensual reading or stimulation. No channel for people who report being targeted. No remedy.
What has to change
Neural data is sensitive data, everywhere. The same protection as health and genetic data, in every jurisdiction.
Consent that means something. Informed, specific, revocable, with the right to have your data deleted.
A ban on non-consensual access. No company or government reads, stimulates or alters anyone's brain without consent.
Daylight on state research. Human neurotech research by militaries and agencies gets independent ethics review and public reporting.
Investigate every report. People who report non-consensual neural targeting get a formal channel, a medical and technical investigation, and a public answer. Not dismissal.
A right to remedy. Somewhere to report abuse, an independent investigation, and redress.