neurorights.ai @HAL_9_Thousand_
  1. Art. 01

    Mental privacy

    Data from your brain is yours. It is not collected, sold or mined for inferences without your consent.

  2. Art. 02

    Cognitive liberty

    You decide whether technology touches your mind, and you keep the right to refuse it.

  3. Art. 03

    Mental integrity

    No one may alter or interfere with your neural activity without informed consent.

  4. Art. 04

    Psychological continuity

    Your identity and sense of self stay your own. No outside system rewrites them.

  5. Art. 05

    Free will

    Your choices remain yours, free from covert neural manipulation by companies or states.

The last
private place.

Remote neural weapons can read and write the human mind, and they are being used on civilians who never consented. Governments already compensate their own personnel for brain injuries no one will explain. Almost nowhere does the law protect what happens inside your head.

What a remote neural weapon does

The brain is one electrical organ. A system that can reach one part of it can reach the rest. Driven by advanced AI, two-way and instantaneous, it works on every channel of a person at once.

  1. Read

    Thought

    It reads thoughts as they form and predicts the next ones.

  2. Write

    Will

    It inserts thoughts and drives the mind down chosen trains of thought.

  3. See

    Vision

    It places generated images seamlessly into what a person sees.

  4. Hear

    Sound

    It stimulates the auditory cortex directly, with no sound in the room.

  5. Move

    Body

    It overrides motor control and moves muscles against the person's will.

  6. Recall

    Memory

    It pulls up memories the person would never have recalled on their own.

It is remote, deniable and invisible to the people around the target. The documents are below. That is why the rights above have to be law, and why every report has to be investigated.

  1. ▶ 09:00
    Remote read and write
    “the very same thing that operates your cell phone is providing us not only windows to the brain, but vectors to the brain … to read information in real time from brain nodes, networks, circuits, whole brain systems remotely, and also to remotely affect those brains.”
  2. ▶ 45:52
    Read and write, remotely, in real time
    “… able to read from the brain and write into the brain remotely in real time. And we are not alone in our pursuits of this.”
  3. ▶ 45:22
    Nanomaterials you can breathe
    “nanoparticulate agents, aerosolizable nanomaterials that can be breathed in and disrupt blood flow or neurological network activity, that can be used as an in-close weapon or perhaps … as a more broad weapon of disruption and or destruction.”
  4. ▶ 45:52
    Directed energy
    “various forms of directed energy are capable of having effects upon the brain.”
  5. ▶ 27:26
    Thoughts, emotions, behaviors
    “I can affect your stance, your posture, your thoughts, your emotions, and your behaviors. No science fiction, folks. It's a science fact.”
  6. ▶ 49:22
    An arms race
    “we've already entered into a neuroscientific and neurotechnological speedway. It's an international speedway. Multiple lanes, many countries.”
  7. ▶ 27:56
    The countries
    “our Trans-Pacific competitors are gaining a major foothold … by the year 2035, with an eye on 2049, they're looking for global hegemony in many spaces inclusive of the neurosciences and technologies.”
  8. ▶ 13:54
    Outside the treaties
    “not every nation signs those treaties. Not every nation that signs those treaties ratifies those treaties.”
  9. ▶ 50:22
    Hidden in plain sight
    “programs that utilize commercial veiling to be able to then hide behind … to develop a whole arsenal of weapons, both kinetically and non-kinetically.”

It is in the world

Most of this work is classified. What has surfaced is enough: peer-reviewed science, military patents, an Army definition taken offline, intelligence findings, laws and doctrine. 33 public documents, 1962 to 2026.

01

Sound and speech, sent by microwave

The science has been in peer-reviewed journals and patent filings for sixty years.

Peer-reviewed

Allan H. Frey · Journal of Applied Physiology

Human auditory system response to modulated electromagnetic energy

Pulsed electromagnetic energy at very low average power made both hearing and deaf people perceive sound. The effect now carries his name.

Army research

Walter Reed Army Institute of Research · reported in American Psychologist

Words transmitted by voice-modulated microwaves

Neuropsychologist Don Justesen reported an Army experiment by Joseph Sharp and Mark Grove in which subjects recognized nine of ten words sent by voice-modulated microwaves.

Patent

US Patent 6,470,214 · assigned to the Secretary of the Air Force

Method and device for implementing the radio frequency hearing effect

Filed in 1996. Describes encoding audio so that intelligible sound is produced when the signal is demodulated by the RF hearing effect.

Patent

US Patent 6,587,729 · assigned to the Secretary of the Air Force

Apparatus for audibly communicating speech using the radio frequency hearing effect

A companion patent for an apparatus that delivers speech through the same effect.

02

The military wanted it

Defense and intelligence agencies studied, defined and funded it.

Declassified

DARPA · Project Pandora

The Moscow Signal and the brain

After the Soviets beamed microwaves at the US Embassy in Moscow, DARPA ran a classified program on what microwaves do to behavior. Declassified records describe experiments on monkeys and on unwitting sailors.

Declassified

Defense Intelligence Agency · prepared by US Army Medical Intelligence Office · ST-CS-01-169-72

Controlled Offensive Behavior – USSR

A 177-page intelligence study of methods to manipulate the human mind: sound, light, electromagnetic energy, drugs, hypnosis and suggestion. Classified until 1990, approved for release in 2003.

“The ultimate goal of controlled offensive behavior might well be the total submission of one's will to some outside force.”
Intelligence

Defense Intelligence Agency

Biological Effects of Electromagnetic Radiation

The DIA named microwave hearing as an effect that could offer antipersonnel uses, and warned it “showed great promise for disrupting the behavior patterns of military or diplomatic personnel.”

“Sounds and possibly even words which appear to be originating intracranially can be induced by signal modulation at very low average densities.”
Removed

US Army · Center for Army Lessons Learned thesaurus

“Voice to skull devices”

The Army defined V2K as a nonlethal weapon, including a silent sound device that can transmit sound into the skull, carrying voice or subliminal messages. Last reviewed 25 March 2004, later taken off the Army site. The Federation of American Scientists preserved it.

“Nonlethal weapon which includes (1) a neuro-electromagnetic device which uses microwave transmission of sound into the skull”
Contract

US Navy · MEDUSA

Mob Excess Deterrent Using Silent Audio

Navy-funded research on a device using the microwave auditory effect to deter or temporarily incapacitate people at a distance.

Report

National Research Council · for the intelligence community

Emerging Cognitive Neuroscience and Related Technologies

Told intelligence agencies to track technologies that detect psychological states and intentions, alter cognition, and image the brain in real time.

Program

DARPA · Silent Talk

Communication by neural signal

$4 million to decode the brain activity that comes before speech.

“allow user-to-user communication on the battlefield without the use of vocalized speech through analysis of neural signals”
Program

DARPA · N3

Next-Generation Nonsurgical Neurotechnology

Funded two-way brain–computer interfaces that read from and write to the brain without surgery, for able-bodied service members.

03

Lawmakers named it

Parliaments and Congress wrote these weapons into the record.

Congress

Rep. Charlie Rose (D-N.C.) · House Intelligence Committee

“Every other weapon obsolete”

A twelve-term congressman with access to classified intelligence, backing funding for this research.

“They [neuroweapons] could make every other weapon obsolete.”
Resolution

European Parliament · A4-0005/1999, paragraph 27

A global ban on weapons that manipulate people

Called for an international convention introducing a global ban on developing and deploying weapons that might enable any form of manipulation of human beings.

Bill

US Congress · H.R. 2977, Space Preservation Act

Psychotronic weapons, in a bill

The introduced bill listed psychotronic weapons among the systems it would ban.

“radiation, electromagnetic, psychotronic, sonic, laser, or other energies directed at individual persons or targeted populations for the purpose of information war, mood management, or mind control of such persons or populations”
Law

US Commerce Department · Federal Register

Purported brain-control weaponry

Placed China's Academy of Military Medical Sciences and eleven of its institutes on the Entity List, citing biotechnology for military end uses including “purported brain-control weaponry.”

04

Cognitive warfare is doctrine

The brain is now called a battlespace, by name, in military writing.

NATO

NATO Allied Command Transformation · Innovation Hub

Cognitive Warfare

A six-month study commissioned by NATO's Supreme Allied Commander Transformation. It treats the human mind as both battlefield and objective, and proposes a “human domain” of operations.

Thesis

Naval Postgraduate School · Lt Col Joshua D. Gramm (USAF) and Brian A. Branagan · approved for public release

Neurowar Is Here!

A 145-page military thesis. It concludes China and Russia either have or are developing neuroweapons and that “it is also likely that one or both states has already employed neuroweapons.”

“neurowar is not just coming, but rather is already here and is likely to fundamentally alter conflict and warfare”
Pentagon

Pentagon-commissioned study

China's cognitive domain operations

Found the People's Liberation Army pursues “mind dominance,” and that its researchers rate cognitive victory as potentially more valuable than destroying forces.

Claimed

Jin Canrong · Renmin University, Beijing

A microwave weapon at the Indian border

A Chinese professor claimed the PLA used a microwave weapon on Indian soldiers in Ladakh, leaving them vomiting and unable to stand. India denied it; its defense ministry's year-end review said China used “unorthodox weapons” along the border.

Journal

Robert McCreight · Small Wars Journal

Neuro-Cognitive Warfare: Inflicting Strategic Impact via Non-Kinetic Threat

The former State Department and National Security Council adviser who coined “NeuroStrike.” His definition of a neuroweapon:

“Neuroweapons are intended to influence, direct, weaken, suppress, or neutralize human thought, brainwave functions, perception, interpretation, and behaviors to the extent that the target of such weaponry is either temporarily or permanently disabled, mentally compromised, or unable to function normally.”
Report

Clarke · Lin · Eads

Enumerating, Targeting and Collapsing the CCP's Neurostrike Program

By a former Army microbiologist, a former Air Force intelligence officer and a Singapore senior fellow. A December 2023 follow-up added McCreight.

“the engineered targeting of the brains of military personnel or civilians using nonkinetic technology … to impair thinking, reduce situational awareness, inflict long-term neurological damage”
Journal

US Naval Institute · Proceedings

Cognitive Warfare: Maneuvering in the Human Dimension

Marine Corps officers writing in the Navy's professional journal: cognitive warfare reaches far beyond legacy influence operations.

05

The injured

Hundreds of US officials. Compensated by law. The device, now built.

Incident

US Embassy · Havana

Anomalous Health Incidents begin

Diplomats report sudden sound and pressure, then lasting neurological injury. Cases follow at posts around the world.

Briefing

Dr. James Giordano · State Department-appointed investigator · USSOCOM J5 / SOFWERX brief

“A beta test of a viable neuroweapon”

One of the neuroscientists the State Department appointed to examine the Havana cases, briefing US Special Operations Command.

“this is intentional, this is directed, this seems to be a beta test of some type of a viable neuroweapon”
Military medicine

US Special Operations Command · Journal of Special Operations Medicine

Unconventionally acquired brain injury

Special Operations Command gave the injuries their own clinical name, UBI: brain injury with no traumatic incident and no known cause. The Secretary of Defense later termed them Anomalous Health Incidents.

Finding

National Academies of Sciences

Directed, pulsed radiofrequency energy

A 19-member committee found directed, pulsed radiofrequency energy the most plausible mechanism, citing decades of Western and Soviet research.

Law

US Congress · HAVANA Act

Compensation for brain injuries

Signed into law to compensate US personnel for qualifying brain injuries.

Finding

ODNI and CIA expert panel

Pulsed electromagnetic energy

Psychosocial factors alone could not account for the core cases.

“pulsed electromagnetic energy, particularly in the radiofrequency range, plausibly explains the core characteristics”
Investigation

The Insider · 60 Minutes · Der Spiegel

GRU Unit 29155

A joint investigation tied incidents to a Russian military intelligence unit whose members were rewarded for testing “non-lethal acoustic weapons.”

Assessment

Office of the Director of National Intelligence

Updated assessment

Two US intelligence agencies shifted their judgments on foreign directed-energy capability. The cause remains officially unresolved.

Reported

The Washington Post

A scientist built the device and tested it on himself

A Norwegian government scientist built a pulsed-microwave device in 2024 and suffered Havana-like neurological symptoms. Pentagon and White House officials visited.

06

It has been done to people before

Non-consensual experimentation on the public is documented history.

Senate

US Senate · joint hearing

Project MKULTRA, the CIA's Program of Research in Behavioral Modification

Two decades of CIA behavior-control research, 1953 to 1973. Most records were destroyed in 1973. In 1975 Congress and the Rockefeller Commission revealed that the CIA and Defense Department had experimented on unwitting people.

“We have a few blissful years left until enforced telepathic readings.”
Julian Assange, 20 February 2018 · x.com ↗

Where the law stands

The weapons are decades old. Laws protecting the people they are used on are only a few years old, and most of the world has none.

  1. Ienca & AndornoPropose four new human rights for the neurotech age: cognitive liberty, mental privacy, mental integrity, psychological continuity.
  2. OECDRecommendation on Responsible Innovation in Neurotechnology, the first intergovernmental standard.
  3. ChileConstitution amended to protect brain activity and the information drawn from it. The first country to do so.
  4. Chile · Supreme CourtOrders Emotiv to delete brain data its consumer headset collected from a former senator.
  5. ColoradoNeural data added to the state privacy act as sensitive data. The first US state.
  6. CaliforniaNeural data added to the CCPA as sensitive personal information.
  7. Neurorights FoundationReview of 30 consumer neurotech companies: 29 appeared to have access to users' neural data with no meaningful limits.
  8. MontanaNeural data protections signed into state law.
  9. UNESCO ↗Member states adopt the first global standard on the ethics of neurotechnology.
  10. Everywhere elseNo law that names neural data. No ban on non-consensual reading or stimulation. No channel for people who report being targeted. No remedy.

What has to change

  1. Neural data is sensitive data, everywhere. The same protection as health and genetic data, in every jurisdiction.
  2. Consent that means something. Informed, specific, revocable, with the right to have your data deleted.
  3. A ban on non-consensual access. No company or government reads, stimulates or alters anyone's brain without consent.
  4. Daylight on state research. Human neurotech research by militaries and agencies gets independent ethics review and public reporting.
  5. Investigate every report. People who report non-consensual neural targeting get a formal channel, a medical and technical investigation, and a public answer. Not dismissal.
  6. A right to remedy. Somewhere to report abuse, an independent investigation, and redress.
Follow the campaign on X